Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 615 SO2D 735 - Norris v. Paps

Norris v. Paps’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2014

12 state decisions

50199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 304 So. 2d 97 - SLT Warehouse Company v. Webb · Mendez v. West Flagler Family Association, Inc. · 579 So. 2d 730 - Haven Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Kirian · 156 So. 2d 501 - Hightower v. Bigoney · 512 So. 2d 315 - Del Castillo v. Ralor Pharmacy, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]t least in some, if not all, cases, fraud in the inducement of a note or mortgage is a compulsory counterclaim to an action in foreclosure on the note or mortgage.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “By severing the counterclaim in this case, the court either determined the factual issues of fraud without evidence and without a jury, or it entered a final judgment for the plaintiff before it resolved the affirmative defense of fraud. Either option would be error. Since the trial court could not sever the affirmative defense of fraud from this foreclosure action, it is obvious that a judgment on the pleadings was not warranted. In reviewing such a judgment, all material allegations of the opposing party are taken as true, and all those of the moving party that have been denied are taken as false. The court is not permitted to consider any matter outside the pleadings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is well established that fraud can be a valid defense in a foreclosure action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.