615 So. 2d 786 - State v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2018
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Mincey v. Arizona · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Scott v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he taint may be dissipated by advice to the defendant of his right to refuse to consent so as to render the subsequent consent free and voluntary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The rule as stated in Gonzalez [v. State], 578 So.2d [729,] at 736 [(Fla. 3d DCA 1991) ], is that where the state seeks to rely upon a consent to search, the state has the burden to establish that the consent was freely and voluntarily given by a “preponderance of the evidence” except where the consent was obtained after illegal police action, in which event the state’s burden becomes the higher standard of “clear and convincing evidence.” Inasmuch as we have determined there was no illegal police action preceding appellee’s consent, the state’s burden was “preponderance of the evidence.” Since the only evidence on the issue was the state’s evidence of the voluntary nature of the consent, its burden was met.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Warrantless searches are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment . . . and Article I, section 12, of the Florida Constitution, subject to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.