Leonard v. Leonard’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Arceneaux v. Domingue · 563 So. 2d 850 - Lirette v. State Farm Ins. Co. · 312 So. 2d 289 - Meyer v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY LIC. CON., ETC. · 578 So. 2d 158 - Dupre v. Joe's Riverside Seafood, Inc. · 460 So. 2d 655 - Gustafson v. Koch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. The total child support obligation shall be determined by adding together the basic child support obligation amount, the net child care costs, the cost of health insurance premiums, extraordinary medical expenses, and other extraordinary expenses. . . . . C. Each party's share of the total child support obligation shall then be determined by multiplying his or her percentage share of combined adjusted gross income times the total child support obligation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Finn v. Jackowski“If a party is voluntarily unemployed or underemployed, his or her gross income shall be determined as set forth in R.S. 9:315.9.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.