Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 615 SW2D 69 - King v. State

King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1996
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 22 Cal. 3d 749 - People v. Arbuckle · United States v. Barker · Fields v. State · Smith v. State · McMahon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “are not in point for they do not deal with guilty pleas.” King, 615 S.W.2d at 77 . Those two cases address”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.