Quigg v. Crist’s Empirical Analysis
616 F.2d 1107 · 1980
Citation profile
44 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Harris v. Vasquez (1990), Jeffries v. Blodgett (1993)
44 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Townsend v. Sain · Doyle v. Ohio · Cupp v. Naughten · Henderson v. Kibbe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“comment is extensive, [whether] an inference of guilt from silence is stressed to the jury as a basis of conviction, and [whether] there is evidence that could have supported acquittal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether the new evidence would probably produce an acquittal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under Carothers, the giving of an aiding and abetting instruction does not violate due process where the state has abolished the distinction between principals and accessories, and where there is evidence before the jury to support the instruction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Frazier v. Kincheloe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.