Ciccone v. Textron, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
616 F.2d 1216 · 1980
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2014 · most notably Mohasco Corp. v. Silver (1980), Rasimas v. Michigan Department of Mental Health (1983)
24 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 633 (§ 14 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans · Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans · Loeb v. Textron, Inc. · Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Smith · Easton v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No civil action may be commenced by an individual under this section until 60 days after a charge alleging unlawful discrimination has been filed with the Secretary. Such a charge shall be filed— (1) [W]ithin 180 days after the alleged unlawful practice occurred; ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In the case of an alleged unlawful practice occurring in a State which has a law prohibiting discrimination in employment because of age and establishing or authorizing a State authority to grant or seek relief from such discriminatory practice, no suit may be brought under section 626 of this title before the expiration of sixty days after proceedings have been commenced under the State law, unless such proceedings have been earlier terminated ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“special facts justifying an equitable tolling,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.