Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 616 F.2d 237 - Crocker v. Hakes

Crocker v. Hakes’s Empirical Analysis

616 F.2d 237 · 1980

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Creative Environments, Inc. v. Estabrook (1982), Yale Auto Parts, Inc. v. Johnson (1985)

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

27019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Baker v. McCollan · Griffin v. Breckenridge · Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. · Martinez v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he violation of a state statute does not automatically give rise to a violation of rights secured by the Constitution.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “mere ... mistakes of state law do not rise to the level of constitutional violations”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.