Harper v. Lindsay’s Empirical Analysis
616 F.2d 849 · 1980
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently May 2014 · most notably Yi Wu Zhang v. Gonzales (2005), Calderon-Ontiveros v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1986)
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Connally v. General Construction Co. · Nebbia v. People of State of New York · Hicks v. Miranda · Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas · Dixon v. Love
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) The correct license fee has not been tendered to the city. (b) The applicant for, or holder of, a license, if an individual; or any of the stockholders holding more than ten (10) per cent of the stock of the corporation, any of the officers and directors, if the applicant or license holder is a corporation; or any of the partners, including limited partners, if the applicant or license holder is a partnership; or the manager or any other person principally in charge of the massage or nude modeling establishment, has been convicted of any . of the following offenses or convicted of an offense without the State of Indiana that would have constituted any of the following offenses if committed within the State of Indiana, in the past five (5) years: (1) An offense involving the use of force or violence upon the person of another that amounts to a felony pursuant to the laws of the State of Indiana. (2) An offense involving sexual misconduct, which constitutes a felony or misdemeanor under the laws of the State of Indiana. (c) The applicant for or holder. of a license has knowingly made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of fact in the license application, or in any document required by the city in connection with this article. (d) The applicant or license holder has had an establishment, massagist, or other similar permit or license denied, revoked, or suspended by the city or any other state or local agency within the past five (5) years. (e) The applicant, if an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.