Lockwood v. Commissioner Social Security Administration’s Empirical Analysis
616 F.3d 1068 · 2010
Citation profile
46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2021
most recently cited
7 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Ring v. Arizona · Christensen v. Harris County · Walton v. Arizona · Heckler v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Commissioner will not apply the age categories mechanically in a borderline situation. If [a claimant is] within a few days to a few months of reaching an older age category, and using the older age category would result in a determination or decision that [the claimant is] disabled, [the Administration] will consider whether to use the older age category after evaluating the overall impact of all the factors of [the claimant’s] case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Byes v. Astrue“we will consider whether to use the older age category after evaluating the overall impact of all the factors of your case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ross v. Berryhill“does not impose on ALJs a per se procedural requirement to address borderline age categorization in every borderline case,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ross v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.