El-Tabech v. Clarke’s Empirical Analysis
616 F.3d 834 · 2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (§ 20409 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · Farrar v. Hobby · Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall be allowed on any money judgment in a civil case recovered in a district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Time spent preparing fee applications is generally compensable,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Fund v. Reynolds“excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.