Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 616 NE2D 1061 - Malacina v. Malacina

Malacina v. Malacina’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2016

13 state decisions

110199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nissen Trampoline Co. v. Terre Haute First National Bank · State v. White · Ingersoll-Rand Corp. v. Scott · State v. McKenzie · Schuh v. Silcox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clearly erroneous as contrary to or not supported by the evidence”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A trial court has wide discretion to correct errors and to grant new trials.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “and the process of entry of the requisite findings as”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.