Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 616 NE2D 750 - Miller v. State

Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2018

13 state decisions

60199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gideon v. Wainwright · Herko v. United States · Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) A loaded or unloaded firearm; or (2) A weapon, device, ... equipment, chemical substance, or other material that in the manner it is used, or could ordinarily be used, or is intended to be used, is readily capable of causing serious bodily injury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) was the defendant misled by the variance in the evidence from the allegations and specifications in the charge in the preparation and maintenance of his defense, and was he harmed or prejudiced thereby; (2) will the defendant be protected in the future criminal proceeding covering the same event, facts, and evidence against double jeopardy?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Lest there remain any doubt about the constitutional stature of the reasonable-doubt standard, we explicitly hold that the Due Process Clause protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.