Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

616 So. 2d 1051

Wells v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-03-31

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2010

1 district ·

Relies on 489 So. 2d 22 - Christopher v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-03-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

POLEN, Judge,

¶1concurring specially.

¶2I agree with the majority’s per curiam affirmance of this appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s third rule 3.850 motion. I would further hold that the instant motion and this appeal from its denial is an abuse of process as an impermissible successive 3.850 motion. See Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22 (Fla.1986).

/616/so2d/1051 · .json · Public domain