Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 616 So. 2d 1129 - Mosley v. State

616 So. 2d 1129 - Mosley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2016

10 state decisions

40199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 475 So. 2d 682 - Florida Bar Standard Jury Instructions Civil 85-1 · 568 So. 2d 18 - Lucas v. State · Breedlove v. State · 422 So. 2d 336 - A. McD. v. State · 464 So. 2d 640 - Wooten v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Bias on the part of a prosecution witness is a valid point of inquiry in cross-examination, but the prospect of bias does not open the door to every question that might possibly develop the subject." ... Evidence of bias may be inadmissible if it unfairly prejudices the trier of fact against the witness or misleads the trier of fact. Therefore, inquiry into collateral matters, if such matters will not promote the ends of justice, should not be permitted if it is unjust to the witness and uncalled for by the circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.