Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

616 So. 2d 120

Belew v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-03-24

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1996

3 state decisions

Relies on Caracciolo v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-03-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm defendant’s conviction without comment. However, it appears that no sentencing guidelines scoresheet was ever filed. Thus, in “an abundance of caution,” we remand this case to the trial court to clarify whether the guidelines scoresheet referred to by the state and defense counsel at the sentencing hearing was “physically present before the judge and the court on the date of sentencing.” Caracciolo v. State, 564 So.2d 1162, 1163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

¶2Affirmed but remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., HALL, J., and ROBERTS, SUSAN W., Associate Judge, concur.
/616/so2d/120 · .json · Public domain