¶1We have for review Hall v. State, 588 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), in which the district court certified the same questions we recently answered in the negative in Tillman v. State, 609 So.2d 1295 (Fla.1992). For the reasons expressed in Tillman, we approve the decision of the district court.
¶2It is so ordered.
¶3dissenting.
¶4I dissent on the basis of my dissenting opinion in Tillman v. State, 609 So.2d 1295 (Fla.1992). The petitioner has only been convicted of one violent crime and there*415fore cannot be a habitual violent felony offender.
¶5BARKETT, C.J., concurs.