Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 616 So. 2d 440 - DeAngelo v. State

616 So. 2d 440 - DeAngelo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 863 So. 2d 271 - Johnston v. State (2003), 787 So. 2d 747 - Stephens v. State (2001)

41 state decisions

190199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · Brewster v. Derwinski · Andrijevic v. Kelleran · Wingo v. Wedding · 283 So. 2d 1 - State v. Dixon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “be formed in a moment and need only exist `for such time as will allow the accused to be conscious of the nature of the act he is about to commit and the probable result of that act.'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`it is permissible to infer that strangulation, when perpetrated upon a conscious victim, involves the foreknowledge of death, extreme anxiety and fear, and that this method of killing is one to which the factor of heinousness is applicable.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[C]ourts should not grant a motion for judgment of acquittal unless the evidence is such that no view which the jury may lawfully take of it favorable to the opposite party can be sustained under the law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.