¶1We have for review Fuller v. State, 605 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), wherein the district court certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have since answered the question in State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993). We quash Fullerand remand for proceedings consistent with Rucker,
¶2It is so ordered.
¶3. We decline to address the other certified question in Fullersince neither party raised or briefed the issue.