¶1We have for review Smith v. State, 608 So.2d 567 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), wherein the court certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have since answered the question in State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993). We quash Smith and remand for proceedings consistent with Rucker.
¶2It is so ordered.