Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 616 So. 2d 811 - Greer v. State

616 So. 2d 811 - Greer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2014

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

80199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Latimer v. Stainer · 359 So. 2d 154 - Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp. · 340 So. 2d 287 - Mitchell v. Bertolla · 515 So. 2d 1074 - Cantrelle Fence & Supply v. Allstate Ins. · Slocum v. Daigre

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “and (3) an identity of the thing demanded. The absence of any of these identities is fatal to a plea of res judicata. 18”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The authority of the thing adjudged takes place only with respect to what was the object of the judgment. The thing demanded must be the same; the demand must be founded on the same cause of action; the demand must be between the same parties, and ... in the same quality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'[c]ause' is said to be the juridical or material fact which is the basis of the right claimed, or the defense pleaded. It can be likened to 'grounds,' 'theory of recovery,' or the principle upon which a specific demand is grounded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.