Rudd v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 91 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Turner v. State (1991), Hudson v. State (1984)
3 federal appellate · 91 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kirby v. Illinois · McWherter v. State · Thomas v. State · Landers v. State · Earl v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant is represented by counsel who filed a brief in the case. There is no right to hybrid representation. The pro se briefs therefore present nothing for review. An examination of the contentions asserted therein reveals no error that should be considered in the interest of justice.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]here is no right to hybrid representation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. Collins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.