Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 616 SW2D 822 - State v. Koetting

State v. Koetting’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

1 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2014

1 district · 19 state decisions

1301981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Connally v. General Construction Co. · Roth v. United States · Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · United States v. Harriss · Cohen v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““... If you do find the defendant guilty of tampering in the second degree, you will assess and declare the punishment at imprisonment for a term fixed by you, but not to exceed one year.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “1.Imprisonment for a term fixed by the court, but not to exceed the term assessed and declared by the jury in its verdict, or 2. The payment of a fine, the amount of which would be determined by the court in accordance with applicable statutes, or 3. Both such imprisonment and the payment of such a fine. In your deliberations your duty is to determine whether the defendant is guilty or innocent, and, if you find him guilty, to assess and declare the punishment as directed in other instructions given to you.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “1. A person commits the crime of harassment if for the purpose of frightening or disturbing another person, he (1) communicated in writing or by telephone a threat to commit any felony; or ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.