Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 F.2d 1 - United States v. Imbruglia

United States v. Imbruglia’s Empirical Analysis

617 F.2d 1 · 1980

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably United States v. Sanchez (1990), United States v. Flaherty (1981)

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

2701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2315 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · Santoni v. United States · Houltin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the omitted evidence creates a reasonable doubt that did not otherwise exist(.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(T) he omission must be evaluated in the context of the entire record. If there is no reasonable doubt about guilt whether or not the additional evidence is considered, there is no justification for a new trial. On the other hand, if the verdict is already of questionable validity, additional evidence of relatively minor importance might be sufficient to create a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “427 U.S. at 106 (96 S.Ct. at 2398). Evidence will be deemed material if”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.