Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 F.2d 1234 - George Hoffman Sons Inc v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen & Helpers of America Local No

George Hoffman Sons Inc v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen & Helpers of America Local No’s Empirical Analysis

617 F.2d 1234 · 1980

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
October 2013
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 2013

13 federal appellate ·

1601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. · Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades Council · National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board · Padilla-Martinez v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To be lawful a strike must be for objectives wholly 'primarily.' [sic] Any 'secondary' objective will bring the union's action within the reach of Sec. 8(b)(4).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must demonstrate the error with something more than general assertions.... A reviewing court will not make its own search of the record to determine whether such general assertions are supportable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]t is not necessary to find that the sole object of the strike was secondary so long as one of the union's objectives was to influence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.