Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 F.2d 740 - Fenster v. Brown

Fenster v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

617 F.2d 740 · 1979

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
4
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 46 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice (1984), Fund for Constitutional Government v. National Archives & Records Service (1981)

36 federal appellate · 46 district · 4 state decisions

40019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)

Relies on Jones v. Nor-Tex Agencies, Inc. · Gilbert A. Cuneo v. Donald H. Rumsfeld · Nationwide Building Maintenance, Inc. v. Sampson · Gilbert A. Cuneo v. James A. Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense · Vermont Low Income Advocacy Council, Inc. v. Usery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court may assess against the United States reasonable attorney fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred in any case under this section in which the complainant has substantially prevailed.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “speaks for an award of [attorney's fees] where the complainant's victory is likely to add to the fund of information that citizens may use in making vital political choices.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'(1) the benefit to the public, if any, derived from the case; (2) the commercial benefit to the complainant; (3) the nature of the complainant's interest in the records sought; and (4) whether the government's withholding of the records had a reasonable basis in law.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.