Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 F.3d 109 - Argueta v. Holder

Argueta v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

617 F.3d 109 · 2010

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
April 2023
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice · Simeonov v. Ashcroft · Barco-Sandoval v. Gonzales · Mendez v. Holder · Rodriguez v. Gonzales

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “General rule. To establish eligibility for special rule cancellation of removal under section 309(f)(1)(A) of IIRIRA, as amended by section 203 of NACARA, the alien must establish that: (1) The alien is not inadmissible under section 212(a)(2) or (3) or deportable under section 237(a)(2), (3) or (4) of the Act (relating to criminal activity, document fraud, failure to register, and security threats); (2) The alien has been physically present in the United States for a continuous period of 7 years immediately preceding the date the application was filed; (3) The alien has been a person of good moral character during the required period of continuous physical presence; and (4) The alien’s removal from the United States would result in extreme hardship to the alien, or to the alien's spouse, parent or child who is a United States citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.