Ayeni v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
617 F.3d 67 · 2010
Citation profile
22 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice · Gui Yin Liu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · MONREAL · United States v. Mariano · Mendez v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'claim of constitutional or legal error must at least be colorable .'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[a] bare allegation of either a constitutional shortfall or legal error' will not suffice,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“matter of substance, not a function of labeling,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.