Newman v. Beard’s Empirical Analysis
617 F.3d 775 · 2010
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Perry v. Sindermann · Daniels v. Williams · Fuentes v. Shevin · Turner v. Safley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“violation) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Based on the foregoing, we will affirm the judgment of the District Court. Finding no basis to alter or amend the judgment, we will also affirm the District Court’s denial of Coulter’s motion for reconsideration. 1 . For example, in her brief on appeal, Coulter states that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“accept all factual allegations as true, construe the ... complaint in the light most favorable to [the plaintiff], and determine whether, under any reasonable reading of the amended complaint, he may be entitled to relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Acceptance of responsibility is the beginning of rehabilitation. And a recognition that there are rewards for those who attempt to reform is a vital and necessary step toward completion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Heath v. Norwood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.