United States v. Lanham’s Empirical Analysis
617 F.3d 873 · 2010
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1519 (§ 802 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2241 (Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 242 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Olano · Farmer v. Brennan · Davis v. Alaska
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“strike us as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must, as one member of this court recently stated during oral argument, strike us as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Material omissions of fact can be interpreted as an attempt to 'cover up' or 'conceal' information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.