Issaq v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
617 F.3d 962 · 2010
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. · Johnson v. United States · Union Pacific R. Co. v. Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen Gen. Comm. of Adjustment, Central Region · Negusie v. Holder · Samer Mansour v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a case-processing rule that limits the arguments available to an alien in this court when those arguments have not been raised properly at the agency level”); Mambwe v. Holder, 572 F.3d 540 , 550 (8th Cir.2009) (noting that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alvarado v. Holder“first to present to the Board any arguments that lie within its power to address” is not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alvarado v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.