State v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Righetti · Soto v. United States · State v. Humes · United States v. Kadota · State v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen a court sentences a person to prison for a violation of section 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, or 609.345, the court shall provide that after the person has completed the sentence imposed, the commissioner of corrections shall place the person on conditional release. If the person was convicted for a violation of section 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, or 609.345, the person shall be placed on conditional release for five years, minus the time the person served on supervised release. If the person was convicted for a violation of one of those sections a second or subsequent time * * * the person shall be placed on conditional release for ten years, minus the time the person served on supervised release.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Noggle“district court has jurisdiction at any time to correct a sentence that is not authorized by law”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Meredyk
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.