Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 P2D 243 - Coleman v. State

Coleman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
5
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2023

19 state decisions

11019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Faretta v. California · Irving III v. Mississippi · United States v. Dougherty · United States ex rel. Maldonado v. Denno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the trial court is not required to appoint standby counsel,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “First, the trial court must determine whether the accused has made a sufficient demand to represent himself.... Next, the court is to determine whether the defendant has the capacity to decide intelligently and to understand what he is doing, i.e., whether he can make a valid waiver of his right to counsel.... Next, the trial court should determine that the defendant is making a waiver of his right in a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'-was not going to matter or help Mathis' case at trial. . Mathis also cites Coleman's finding that '[clompetency to stand trial and competency to proceed pro se are not synonymous,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.