Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 P.2d 369 - Gregerson v. Jensen

Gregerson v. Jensen’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2019

8 state decisions

401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zion's Properties, Inc. v. Holt · Ferris v. Jennings · White v. Breen · 1 Utah 2d 46 - Mathis v. Madsen · Flegel v. Dowling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all the writings adduced, viewed together in light of the situation and circumstances of the parties at the time they were written, show unmistakably that they relate to the same matter, and constitute several parts of one connected transaction, so that the mind can come to no other reasonable conclusion from the evidence so offered than that they were each written with reference to those concurrent or preceding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) there is material, competent evidence which is in fact newly discovered; (b) by due diligence the evidence could not have been discovered and produced at trial; and (c) the evidence must not be merely cumulative or incidental but must be of sufficient substance that there is a reasonable likelihood that with it there would have been a different result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If an original agreement is within the statute of frauds, a subsequent agreement which modifies the original written agreement must also satisfy the requirements of the statute of frauds to be enforceable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.