Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 SO2D 1046 - Hoefert v. State

Hoefert v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2014

19 state decisions

80199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rodriguez v. New York · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · Tamotsu Tanaka v. Creditors' Committee 1 · King v. Lynaugh · Sireci v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence from which premeditation may be inferred includes such matters as the nature of the weapon used, the presence or absence of adequate provocation, previous difficulties between the parties, the manner in which the homicide was committed, and the nature and manner of the wounds inflicted.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 863 So. 2d 271 - Johnston v. State · 995 So. 2d 207 - Bigham v. State
  2. “[t]he unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated by any act imminently dangerous to another and evincing a depraved mind regardless of human life, although without any premeditated design to effect the death of any particular individual.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Kirkland v. State · 995 So. 2d 207 - Bigham v. State
  3. “the State's proof fails to exclude a reasonable hypotheses [sic] that the homicide occurred other than by premeditated design, a verdict of first-degree murder cannot be sustained.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Kirkland v. State · 703 So. 2d 454 - Kormondy v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.