Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 So. 2d 1051 - Hertz Corp. v. Jackson

617 So. 2d 1051 - Hertz Corp. v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
4
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably 753 So. 2d 60 - Aurbach v. Gallina (2000), 679 So. 2d 462 - Oliver v. Davis (1996)

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

150199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Anderson · Susco Car Rental System of Florida v. Leonard · 417 So. 2d 325 - In re Estate of Senz · 363 So. 2d 792 - Castillo v. Bickley · Thomas v. Atlantic Associates, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Liability [of an owner for the negligence of a driver who is not the renter of the vehicle] should be determined on the basis of whether there has, in fact, been a conversion or theft of the vehicle prior to the negligence at issue. We hold that once a vehicle has been the subject of a theft or conversion, the owner’s initial consent has been vitiated and the vehicle is no longer on public highways “by authority of’ the owner.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a breach of custody amounting to a species of conversion or theft will relieve an owner of responsibility for the negligence of one to whom the owner has granted consent to operate the vehicle.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “an owner who gives authority to another to operate the owner's vehicle, by either express or implied consent, has a nondelegable obligation to ensure that the vehicle is operated properly.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.