617 So. 2d 1213 - Taylor v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2015
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 434 So. 2d 1083 - Ray v. Alexandria Mall · 340 So. 2d 287 - Mitchell v. Bertolla · 439 So. 2d 437 - Gunter v. Plauche · 390 So. 2d 1272 - Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc. · 590 So. 2d 55 - Parker v. Southern American Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The amended claim must arise out of the same transaction or occurrence set forth in the original pleading; (2) The purported substitute defendant must have received notice of the institution of the action such that he will not be prejudiced in maintaining a defense on the merits; (3) The'purported substitute defendant must know or should have known that but for a mistake concerning the identity of the proper party 15 defendant, the action would have been brought against him; (4) The purported substitute defendant must not be a wholly new or unrelated defendant, since this would be tantamount to assertion of a new cause of action which would have otherwise prescribed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The crucial focus in determining whether or not a grant of prescription is warranted is on `notice' to the named defendants. Notice allows the defendants to preserve evidence and properly prepare a defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.