Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 SO2D 164 - Simar v. Nowcam Services

Simar v. Nowcam Services’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · Robertson v. Penn · Robertson v. Penn · Jaffarzad v. Jones Truck Lines, Inc. · State ex rel. Cobbs v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The jury may adopt or reject conclusions of experts, according to its own best judgment, giving them weight as they see fit. Arceneaux v. Koch , 567 So.2d 786 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1990). A trier of fact may find adequate proof of a disability by way of testimony of subjective complaints of pain despite the lack of objective symptoms. Gates v. Ashy Construction Co. , 171 So.2d 742 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1965), writ denied , 247 La. 678 , 173 So.2d 542 (1965). Factors to consider in assessing damages for pain and suffering include the severity and duration thereof. Hopkins v. Travasos , 569 So.2d 1056 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1990).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.