Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 So. 2d 291 - Rose v. State

617 So. 2d 291 - Rose v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2019 · most notably 727 So. 2d 216 - Rutherford v. State (1998), 675 So. 2d 567 - Rose v. State (1996)

2 federal appellate · 65 state decisions

410199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Gardner v. Florida · Kentucky v. Stincer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a defendant preempts his attorney's strategy by insisting that a different defense be followed, no claim of ineffectiveness can be made.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The trial court has broad discretion in determining the applicability of mitigating circumstances and may accept or reject the testimony of an expert witness.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]e have held that a new sentencing hearing is warranted `in cases which entail psychiatric examinations so grossly insufficient that they ignore clear indications of either mental retardation or organic brain damage.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.