State v. Riley’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Berkemer v. McCarty · 534 So. 2d 393 - State v. Pennington · 563 So. 2d 622 - Joint Ventures, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp. · 452 So. 2d 540 - Brackin v. Boles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The statutory duty of a person to make a report or give information to a law enforcement officer making a written report relating to an accident shall not be construed as extending to information which would violate the privilege of such person against self-incrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“However, subject to the applicable rules of evidence, a law enforcement officer at a criminal trial may testify as to any statement made to the officer by the person involved in the accident if that person's privilege against self-incrimination is not violated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no such report or statement shall be used as evidence in any trial, civil or criminal,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.