Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

617 So. 2d 405

Docket No. 92-1435.

McBride v. State

Charles McBRIDE, aPPELLANT, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-04-21

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1997

5 state decisions

Relies on 559 So. 2d 608 - Tannihill v. State · 484 So. 2d 104 - Simmons v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-04-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ellen Morris, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Melvina Racey Flaherty, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3*406 PER CURIAM.

¶4We affirm appellant's conviction and sentence except for the order of restitution to the victim which we reverse. The defendant was found not guilty of the theft of the VCR for which restitution was ordered. Therefore, restitution for its loss is improper. See Simmons v. State, 484 So.2d 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Furthermore, the trial court's oral sentence did not include a requirement of restitution although the written sentence did. However, the written order must conform to the oral pronouncement. Tannihill v. State, 559 So.2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

¶5Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for entry of order vacating order of restitution.

¶6ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.

/617/so2d/405 · .json · Public domain