State v. Jamison’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 1998
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · 354 So. 2d 1334 - State v. Sutfield · 403 So. 2d 665 - State v. Acliese · 353 So. 2d 989 - State v. Burnette · In re Wampler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the evidence does not establish the defendant's particular system for committing the charged crime against the prosecutrix, and it otherwise fails to establish a pattern of committing sexual offenses against the same prosecutrix.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"Under the particular circumstances of this case, we need not resolve the question of whether a trial court has the discretion to allow the accused to testify at the Prieur hearing without subjecting himself to cross-examination on the entire case ... The defendant's general denials that he committed the other offenses are primarily a matter for the factfinder at trial and not for the trial court making a pre-trial determination of admissibility in part on the basis of whether the state has substantial evidence provided by the same victims of the charged offenses linking the accused to the other crimes." (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.