Coverson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably 737 So. 2d 322 - Puckett v. State (1999), 823 So. 2d 473 - Caston v. State (2002)
1 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Edwards v. Arizona · North Carolina v. Butler · Smith v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny juror shall be excluded . . . if the court be of opinion that he cannot try the case impartially, and the exclusion shall not be assignable for error.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Edmonds v. State · Edwards v. State“has no right to have specific prospective jurors try his or her case, and ... cannot complain on appeal of a particular exclusion if the end result was a jury composed of fair and impartial jurors.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Edmonds v. State · Edwards v. State“`[A] waiver is knowing and intelligent if it is made with a full awareness both of the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.