Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 So. 2d 694 - Anonymous v. Anonymous

617 So. 2d 694 - Anonymous v. Anonymous’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2013

16 state decisions

100199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 71

Relies on New Jersey v. T. L. O. · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · 592 So. 2d 183 - Whitten v. Whitten · 355 So. 2d 717 - Rosser v. Rosser · Doe v. Roe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an abuse of discretion and perhaps appears to be a punishment upon the husband for his conduct against the marriage.... However, an excessive order for child support is not a basis for punishment for such conduct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The judgment of the trial court pertaining to child support and support-related obligations, particularly the husband's maintenance of the insurance policies, is reversed and remanded to the trial court for reconsideration in light of further evidence of the reasonable needs of the child and the probable cost to the husband of securing the required insurance policies. The court is also directed to consider the effect of the division of property ordered as it affects the gross income of both parties."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an abuse of discretion and perhaps *Page 1095 appears to be a punishment upon the husband for his conduct against the marriage. . . . However, an excessive order for child support is not a basis for punishment for such conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.