State v. Blue’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 543 So. 2d 682 - Ex Parte Edgar · 614 So. 2d 405 - Ex Parte Jackson · 515 So. 2d 704 - Ex Parte Rudolph · State v. Pugh · 466 So. 2d 945 - Barber v. COVINGTON COUNTY COM'N
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The granting or denying of a motion for new trial rests largely within the discretion of the trial court, and the exercise of that discretion carries with it a presumption of correctness that will not be disturbed on appeal unless some legal right was abused and the record plainly and palpably shows that the trial court was in error.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'Mandamus may issue to compel the exercise of discretion by an inferior court; however, it may not be used to control or revise the exercise of that discretion except in a case of abuse. Ex parte Edgar , 543 So.2d[682] at 684 [(Ala. 1989)] (citing Ex parte Smith , 533 So.2d 533 (Ala. 1988)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Ex parte Nice , 407 So.2d 874 , 877 (Ala. 1981). Mandamus is not to be used as a substitute for an appeal, but mandamus can be used to prevent a gross disruption of the administration of criminal justice. Id. '”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.