Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 SO2D 720 - State v. Nesta

State v. Nesta’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2013

3 state decisions

10199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 596 So. 2d 1055 - State v. Camp · 579 So. 2d 763 - State v. Camp · 559 So. 2d 742 - Bailey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]ne who attempts to sell or sells stolen goods to a pawnbroker is not using the stolen items for his own personal use but has met the statutory requirements for dealing in stolen property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.