Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 So. 2d 86 - Fine v. Rubin

617 So. 2d 86 - Fine v. Rubin’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Fox v. Bd. of Sup'rs of La. State Univ.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he burden of showing minimal contacts lies with the party claiming jurisdiction to be proper. Once this burden is met, a presumption of reasonableness of jurisdiction arises. The burden then shifts to the opposing party to prove the assertion of jurisdiction would be so unreasonable in light of traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice as to overcome the presumption of reasonableness created by the defendant's minimum contacts with the forum.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.