Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1986
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Henriksen v. State · Dowden v. State · Blount v. State · 167 Tex. Crim. 355 - Cage v. State · Nunez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There was no objection at the time, and the pre-sentence report, made available to the appellant, was not made a part of the appellate record. Appellant makes no assertion that there were improper matters in the report which the court should not have considered. In light of the pending motion for probation, the failure to object, and all the other facts and circumstances, appellant’s contention is without merit. 3 ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State““ 3 This writer maintains the strong belief that if trial courts would assess punishment at the penalty stage of the trial, and utilize the pre-sentence report only to determine the issue of probation these claims on appeal that the court considered otherwise inadmissible matters contained in the report in assessing punishment would be eliminated.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.