Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 617 SW2D 925 - Crawford v. State

Crawford v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2016 · most notably EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Robinson (1996), Hawkins v. State (1983)

59 state decisions

5301980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · United States v. Agurs · Jackson v. Denno · Witherspoon v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he mere possibility that an item of undisclosed information might have helped the defense, or might have affected the outcome of the trial, does not establish “materiality” in the constitu tional sense ... In determining materiality, the omission must be evaluated in the context of the entire record, and constitutional error is committed only if the omitted evidence creates a reasonable doubt that did not otherwise exist.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “whether there is a probability that the defendant would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing threat to society.” 6 . The defense pointed out for the jury’s benefit that Grigson has a nickname of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The waiver leg rests on the theories that defendants should not be allowed to `sandbag' trial judges and that counsel may deliberately choose, for tactical reasons, to waiver certain rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.