Galitz v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
117 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 117 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Marin v. State (1993), Rumbaugh v. State (1982)
117 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Cortez · Chambers v. Maroney · Brown v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal under the rules hereinafter prescribed ...."”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) the existence of a plea bargaining agreement with the State; (2) the punishment assessed by the trial court is within that recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to personally by the defendant, and (3) the basis of the appellate ground of error has been presented in writing, pretrial, to the trial court for consideration OR the trial court has given permission to pursue an appeal in general or upon specific contentions.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Garcia v. State · Winkles v. State““In the instant case, however, nothing was admitted into evidence other than the transcribed examining trial testimony of the officers who escorted, arrested and ultimately searched appellant. Because this evidence was both a fruit of the contested search, and the only evidence which supplied proof of every element of the offense, appellant has preserved his right to have this Court determine the merits of his pretrial motion to suppress evidence in the felony case and we so hold.... ” (Emphasis in original) Id. at 956.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Snyder v. State · McGlynn v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.