Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 618 F.2d 1053 - Conquest v. Mitchell

Conquest v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

618 F.2d 1053 · 1980

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2008

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

60198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Francis v. Henderson · Addington v. Texas · International Business Machines Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission · Rudolph N. Thornton v. Honorable Howard F. Corcoran

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if an objection is raised in such a manner so as to give the trial court notice of its substance, the rule will be deemed complied with even though the objection could have been more definitively given”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.